E Pluribus Unum

Main menu

Skip to content
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Disclosures

Tag Archives: civic engagement

Post navigation

In 2021, the White House should engage Americans in governance, not censor our data

Posted on November 2, 2020 by Alex

0

Did YOU know the USA has a Federal Data Strategy? Or that it’s part of National US Plan for Open Government? This President and White House should have told you, instead of failing to engage Americans. I participated in another … Continue reading →

Posted in access to information, digital government, e-government, open data, open government, Open Government Partnership, technology, transparency, Trump Administration, United States of AMerica, White House Tagged civic engagement, federal data strategy, open government, Open Government Partnership

President Obama’s jokes “Between the Ferns” connect the young and uninsured to HealthCare.gov

Posted on March 11, 2014 by Alex

1

Why did President Barack Obama go on “Between Two Ferns,” an irreverent talk show hosted by comedian Zack Galifiniakis?

barack-obama-between-2-ferns

The context comes about two thirds in, when the president talked about HealthCare.gov, young “invincibles” and health insurance that costs about as much as a cellphone bill: young people are still not aware of the policy or going to the site.

http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2014/02/12/low-aca-knowledge-and-health-literacy-hinder-young-adult-marketplace-enrollment/

According to White House officials, the appearance on the show made FunnyOrDie.com, the comedy site that hosts the show, the number one referrer of Traffic to Healthcare.gov today.

http://t.co/FrO24hdvcA is the #1 source of referrals to http://t.co/0r93BavlrV right now.

— Tara McGuinness (@HealthCareTara) March 11, 2014

Update: According to an unnamed HHS official on a conference call today, some 19,000 of the 3 million people who have watched the video clicked on Healthcare.gov.

HHS: 19,000 people who watched Funny or Die Obama video have clicked on http://t.co/qnDh3qiUTv. #huge

— John McCormack (@McCormackJohn) March 11, 2014

Update II: McGuiness tweeted that traffic to Healthcare.gov was up 40% compared to the previous day.

Funnyordie video has 11 million views. http://t.co/a7HUExG0vg traffic for yesterday was up almost 40% from Monday.

— Tara McGuinness (@HealthCareTara) March 12, 2014

In other words, it worked. I’ve asked for more comment from the White House on traffic and conversions and will update this post as necessary.

In the meantime, the answers to whether the president should find young audiences online, the White House should be making animated GIFs or the Department of Health and Human Services should be dabbling in doge memes are all a qualified yes: social media and online video are crucial mediums for outreach to a younger generation that has grown up digital, sharing what they read and watch with their friends and family.

Time Magazine’s’s sharp television critic, James Poniewozik, captured why the President of the United States going onto this particular show and adapting his delivery considerably from what Americans might see in other contexts worked better than, say, a Super Bowl interview:

It’s the tone of the comedy as much as the online medium that really targets the young audience Obama is pitching to here. There’s a cringe-humor generation gap; if you’re over a certain age, or simply haven’t watched much of a certain kind of contemporary comedy, you’ll probably watch it thinking that the segment is bombing and Obama is getting legitimately angry. But it’s a good fit for Obama’s sense of humor, which is a little dry and a little cutting–in ways that don’t always play in rooms when there are no ferns present.

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Print
  • Email
  • More
  • Pocket
  • Tumblr
  • Reddit
  • Pinterest

Like this:

Like Loading...
Posted in digital government, health care, open government, social media Tagged Barack Obama, citizen engagement, civic engagement, Healthcare.gov, online video, social media, White House

FCC opens docket on Open Internet rulemaking. Will the Internet show up to comment?

Posted on February 25, 2014 by Alex

2

4808777114_aaa9fb7f2e_zOver at The Verge, editor-in-chief Nilay Patel is urging his readers to contact the Federal Communications Commission and urge the regulator to stand up for consumer protections, competition and to classify the Internet as a utility. The post includes a big graphic with the FCC’s phone number and FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler’s email, encouraging readers to weigh in.

The passionate post and call to action is missing a key component, however: a link to the new public docket on the Open Internet where people can submit official comments through the commission’s electronic file system. As useful as it might be to get the FCC’s phone’s ringing — and as entertaining as it might seem to make the FCC chairman’s ability to get to Inbox Zero impossible — not sending a river of traffic to that docket means that people won’t be adding their voices to those of the companies that are being regulated.

That’s a shame: These comments are entered into the public record and are legally binding. If this is something you care about, on either side of the issue, go weigh in here.

Unfortunately, people are continuing to comment on docket for the first open Internet rulemaking, from years ago. Given that the FCC has no indication on thus FCC.gov webpage that it’s the old one, you can hardly blame them. You can still see all of the old filings online from 2009 at the FCC’s ECFS system, from Level 3 Communication’s recent plea to avoid “anticompetitive, monopoly rent-seeking conduct” one from one B.Davis”: “It is vital that the internet stay neutral and an open field without influence forced upon consumers by internet providers. The internet should be considered as a utility.”

The relaunch of FCC.gov years ago was supposed to make all this easier.

““It is our intention that every proceeding before the agency will be available for public comment,” United States Chief Information Officer Steven VanRoekel told me. (He was the managing director of the FCC then). “If we think of citizens as shareholders, we can do a lot better. Under the Administrative Procedure Act, agencies will get public comments that enlighten decisions. When citizens care, they should be able to give government feedback, and government should be able to take action. We want to enable better feedback loops to enable that to happen.”

As he noted then, comments from Broadband.gov or OpenInternet.gov were entered into the public record. “Today, you can take us to court with one of the blog comments from Broadband.gov,” said VanRoekel. “More than 300,000 citizens gave comment on the Open Internet proceeding.”

Unfortunately, the FCC is not going the extra mile to get people onto the docket. While the commission has tweeted links to the chairman’s statements and fact sheet, they haven’t tweeted or put up a blog post that will lead people directly there.  To be blunt, not doing so looks like public engagement malpractice to me, promulgating press releases but failing to directly engage the American people on an issue of public interest using free social media tools and considerable platform the agency has built over the years.

The FCC may be seeking public comment but anyone clicking this tweet would be hard pressed to figure out how to give it: there’s no link to the Open Internet proceedings on the page.

FCC to propose new rules of the road for #OpenInternet, seeks public comment http://t.co/XBpueqx6mA #NetNeutrality

— The FCC (@FCC) February 19, 2014

So, here’s a free suggestion to the FCC, if they’re listening: tweet a link to the Open Internet proceedings out and give the American people who you serve an opportunity to weigh in.

UPDATE: The @FCC stepped up, tweeting a link to the Open Internet docket 3 times since February 27.

To submit comments on the #OpenInternet proceeding go to http://t.co/EjFcs6Ng9K & click Proceeding #14-28 #netneutrality

— The FCC (@FCC) February 27, 2014

As of March 5th, there were 9,341 comments submitted to proceeding 14-28.

UPDATE: As of May 15, the day of the FCC Open Hearing on the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on the Open Internet, the 14-28 docket had received 21,017 comments. Watch live online at FCC.gov/live.

 

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Print
  • Email
  • More
  • Pocket
  • Tumblr
  • Reddit
  • Pinterest

Like this:

Like Loading...
Posted in digital government, open government, regulatory reform, social media Tagged civic engagement, digital government, FCC, open government, public engagement

Canada to expand public consultation for second open government national action plan

Posted on February 5, 2014 by Alex

2

ogp-canada

Yesterday, I participated in a short teleconference with Canada’s open government advisory panel considering the next version of the country’s open government “action plan.” As readers may know, I accepted an invitation in 2012 from Canadian Minister of Parliament Tony Clement, the president of Canada’s Treasury Board, to be a member of Canada’s advisory panel on open government, joining others from Canada’s tech industry, the academy and civil society. (I shared several recommendations for open government in the first meeting, held on February 28th, 2012, and in another in 2013.)

In preparation for yesterday’s discussion, I downloaded the Open Government Partnership’s Internal Review Mechanism’s report on Canada, which highlights progress in meeting the country’s (largely self-defined) goals for open government, particularly with respect to open data, and identified significant weaknesses in the public consultation taken to date.

The consultative process during the development of the action plan was  weak. The consultation, which was  only done online, including a Twitter  chat session with the TBS President,  took place during a public holiday  and no draft plan was circulated in  advance for discussion. There was  minimal awareness raising around  the consultation process, which  resulted in low participation.

The IRM researcher found minimal evidence of attempts to engage civil  society during implementation of the  action plan with the exception of the  consultation on open data and the Open Government Licence.  Consultation on commitments in  these areas was seen as significantly  stronger and more productive than  the consultations for development of  the action plan and the year one  government selfRassessment.

Consultation of the self assessment  report was carried out online and was not widely publicized, resulting  in a limited level of participation.

Based upon this report and my own observations, I made three suggestions on yesterday’s call:

1) Adoption of an open source e-petition platform from the United Kingdom. While many people remain dubious about online petitions, the tool could be seeded with proposed open government reforms and solicit new ones.

2) Acknowledgement of ongoing debates about electronic surveillance. The Harper administration should launch a more proactive public discussion of what the Canadian people have a right to know about how their electronic communications are being collected, stored and used. Any broad consultation around open government Canada will include this issue.

3) More civic engagement with the media. If improving public consultation is a priority, government officials must go onto television and radio broadcasts, along with sitting down for print interviews. Public engagement through social media and government websites are simply not enough.

The Canadian government should also engage journalists who are making information requests, specifically data journalists, as they are key players in the ecosystem around confirming data releases and quality.  If the government faces significant doubts, it will have to turn to more trusted third parties to validate its programs and their efficacy.

While officials are bound to take heat from skeptical journalists, if the Harper administration is serious about open, more accountable government, its representatives should do so to address criticisms regarding silencing scientists and eliminating Canada’s long form census, a choice that will ironically weaken the quality of the open government data releases that the government itself touts.

Minister Clement acknowledged my concerns, feedback and criticism.

[Image Credit: Open Government Partnership]

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Print
  • Email
  • More
  • Pocket
  • Tumblr
  • Reddit
  • Pinterest

Like this:

Like Loading...
Posted in Canada, digital government, open data, open government, press freedom, privacy Tagged Canada, civic engagement, open data, open government, Open Government Partnership

Adoption of Change by Us in Philadelphia shows the potential of reusable civic software

Posted on November 21, 2011 by Alex

0

This afternoon, Code for America announced that civic engagement platform Change by Us is launching in Philadelphia and into the Civic Commons, where it has been open sourced. Philadelphia residents (and all other interested parties) can check it out now at Philly.ChangeBy.us. As someone who spent the bulk of childhood in Philadelphia, this is great to see.

Abhi Nemani, at Code for America, highlighted the significance of the move over at the nonprofit’s blog, where he wrote that this is an important step forward for the reuse of civic software in the country:

the civic engagement platform initially deployed in New York is now available for any city to use under a free open source license. Change By Us’s reuse shows the opportunity for shared civic software.

He’s spot on. A short video about Change By Us is embedded below. Source code and instructions for installation of Change By Us are available for download on Github.

Change by Us Philadelphia from Change by Us on Vimeo.

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Print
  • Email
  • More
  • Pocket
  • Tumblr
  • Reddit
  • Pinterest

Like this:

Like Loading...
Posted in application, Citizen 2.0, edemocracy, Gov 2.0, localgov, open government, open source, video Tagged Civic Commons, civic engagement, civic software, Code For America, Gov 2.0, open government, open source

Research: More time on Facebook related to more campus participation

Posted on August 22, 2011 by Alex

0

Lock Haven University professor Rey Junco has published new findings that time spent on on Facebook is positively related to involvement in campus activities.

In an upcoming paper on Facebook engagement, Junco shares the results of research relating Facebook usage and activities to outcomes.

Using hierarchical linear regression (N = 2,368) with gender, ethnicity, and parental education level as control variables, I found that time spent on Facebook was a significant positive predictor of time spent in campus activities.

Although time spent on Facebook was a significant positive predictor, it wasn’t the strongest predictor of time spent in campus activities. In fact, it was the weakest predictor. The strongest positive predictors, in order of strength (with strongest first), were:

1. Creating or RSVPing to events on Facebook
2. Commenting
3. Viewing Photos
4. Average time spent on Facebook per day

There were also negative predictors of time spent in campus activities. In order of strength, they were:

1. Posting photos
2. Checking up on friends (or what students call “stalking,” “creeping,” or “lurking”)
3. Playing games on Facebook

It’s an interesting data point, although it’s just part of a larger body of work that’s giving us insight into how our our offline lives are connected to our online lives. The new research does provide a specific example of how the social side of the Internet is increasing its importance in civil society.

Increased campus involvement in activities is not on the same order of civic engagement as toppling an autocratic government or exposing systemic corruption. That said, this research does give us more insight into how the role of the Internet as a platform for collective action could be extended to local government by citizens that are active on social networks, in terms of awareness of town halls, public hearings on notices or, this time of year, ice cream socials.

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Print
  • Email
  • More
  • Pocket
  • Tumblr
  • Reddit
  • Pinterest

Like this:

Like Loading...
Posted in Citizen 2.0, edemocracy, Facebook, Gov 2.0, open government, research, social media Tagged civic engagement, Facebook, research, social media

Post navigation

Civic Texts

Emerging technology has the power to make democracy stronger or weaker. Understanding where, when, and how is the hard part. Subscribe to Civic Texts to get insights about how technologies are changing our democracy in your inbox.

280 character dispatches

My Tweets

Subscribe

RSS Feed RSS - Posts

Recent Posts

  • Anti-democratic policy and chaotic leadership will force more institutions to reassess how they use Twitter December 19, 2022
  • How governments should respond to changes at Twitter November 19, 2022
  • The metaverse of 2040 must encode democratic values, or it will enable an authoritarian nightmare July 15, 2022
  • Smarter disclosure of hospital data may be a sovereign remedy for price gouging May 28, 2022
  • How open government can prevent digital redlining March 18, 2022
  • Why CovidTests.gov won’t be the next HealthCare.gov January 13, 2022
  • What was missing from President Biden’s remarks at the Open Government Summit December 16, 2021
  • The future of the Open Government Partnership depends on White House leadership November 4, 2021
  • Biden administration asks for comment on broken commitments on open government September 16, 2021
  • On Juneteenth and Independence Day, the USA celebrates freedom, liberty, and justice June 17, 2021

Top Posts & Pages

  • Russia withdraws from Open Government Partnership. Too much transparency? [UPDATED]
  • Why HealthSherpa.com is not a replacement for Healthcare.gov [UPDATED]

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Flickr

Today, I asked the US National Archives if President Trump's direct messages on Twitter are presidential records. Answer: yes. Context: https://www.archives.gov/press/press-releases/2017/nr-43Foster HackathonHackathon
More Photos

Recent Comments

Slow Food OGP Oversh… on The future of the Open Governm…
Supporting: Letter t… on How federal agencies can make…
Supporting: Letter t… on In 2021, We the People need a…
Open letter on open… on President Trump signs historic…
Open letter on open… on How federal agencies can make…

Archives

  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • July 2022
  • May 2022
  • March 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • September 2021
  • June 2021
  • March 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • September 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • June 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.com
Create a website or blog at WordPress.com
  • Follow Following
    • E Pluribus Unum
    • Join 221 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • E Pluribus Unum
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: